Rhetorical Analysis Essay(William Gibson-cyberpunk) Essay

Rhetorical Analysis (William Gibson-cyberpunk) - Essay Example According to Grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia, Gernberk’s stories were described as ‘hackneyed adventure tales in which heroes outfitted in dubious space metal wrecked alien words and rescued space maidens’ (New Grolier Multimedia encyclopedia 112). The popularity of the Amazing stories led to new entrants in the 1920s and 1930s to include, Science wonder stories, Wonder stories and Astounding stories. It was Campbell’s work which gave a credible representation of science fiction on how technology has an impact on individuals as well as their cultures through complex narrative techniques as well as exhaustive approaches to subject matters. His works have been regarded as the golden age of science fiction under which science fiction writers such as Robert A. Heinlein, Theordore Sturgeon and Isaac Asimov flourished. Major themes of science fiction are listed by Grolier as robots, alternate worlds, faster- than- light travel, the seeding of the galaxies by the humans and aliens and its many astonishing consequences and the full range of possibilities presented by the nuclear power. The impact of technology on everyday lives and on the planet’s fate became more dominant in science fiction from the 1950s onwards. Most notable development was the New Wave associated with authors such as Brian Aldiss and J.G Ballard whose focus was on topical issues such as environmental depletion, urban overcrowding, and how technology relates to drug abuse, crime and sexuality. The new wave in some aspects introduces cyberpunk’s attention to the impact of technology on the present no less than on the future an important component which features in William Gibson’s works and his contemporaries – that of computer technology. This continuous intermingling of reality and fiction has depicted science fiction as a means of sharpening the awareness of a people to their reality by de-familiarizing it through imaginations and fantasies (Heuser

14 Principles of the Toyota Way (Toyota Production Systems) Thesis

14 Principles of the Toyota Way (Toyota Production Systems) - Thesis Example Corporation is the world’s largest automaker and the high quality ratings for its vehicles are a result of very few defects found in them in comparison to any other competitors. Across all its production facilities throughout the world, Toyota has been known to raise the bar for maintaining quality and efficiency in a consistent fashion thereby bringing in a sense of excellence into manufacturing, procedures and product development. The result of this management strategy has been its steady rise into amassing a market share and revenue margin to such an extent that saw it making a larger profit than every other major automaker in addition to gaining the respect, admiration and praise of every business leader and management expert around the world (Jeffrey Liker, 2004). The ‘Toyota way’ is a management philosophy that revolves around a set of management principles followed by Toyota that are known to have contributed to the enhancement of its reputation the world over in terms of reliability and quality. These management principles are collectively used under the ‘Toyota production system’ also known as ‘Lean production’ (Michael Hoseus, 2007). The purpose of such a production system is aimed at improving the speed with which business processes are executed, provide more quality in the product or service, reduce the cost of operation and management and achieve all this irrespective of the industry where such a management system has been adopted. The Toyota Production System is one of the foundational principles which is a part of the corporate culture within the Toyota group. Over the years, the system has evolved into a paradigm par excellence for the manufacturing world and has transformed the prospects for several industries. The approach has helped foster better involvement from the employees across all levels of the organization and has provided a tangible oversight over the seemingly visible different between the traditional approaches to